Faculty / Staff and Student Consensual Relationships Policy (Policy 7015)

Faculty, administrators, and others who educate, supervise, evaluate, employ, counsel, coach or otherwise make decisions or recommendations as to the other person in connection with their employment or education at the University, or who otherwise have actual or apparent authority over a student or subordinate, should understand the fundamentally asymmetrical nature of the relationship. Such relationships are prohibited. Intimate Relationships between the following individuals are specifically prohibited:. This list is not exhaustive; other circumstances in which one individual has greater power or authority over another may also violate this policy. If individuals already in an Intimate Relationship foresee the possibility of entering into a relationship of power or authority for example, through one party enrolling in a program or a class, or taking up a new position , or where an Intimate Relationship arises in the context of an existing relationship of power or authority, the individual with supervisory, evaluative or other position of authority and power must notify the relevant supervisors, directors or deans immediately. The relevant supervisor, dean or director shall have the authority, in consultation with the Office of Equal Opportunity, to set reasonable conditions to eliminate both the substance and appearance of conflict of interest or abuse of power or authority; to prevent the establishment of direct authority; to minimize and attenuate indirect authority; or to grant an exception to the policy; provided, however, that exceptions will be granted only in extenuating and extraordinary circumstances. The relevant supervisor, dean or director may also take measures to prevent the deprivation of educational or employment opportunities for the student or subordinate, and will have the authority, in consultation with the Office of Equal Opportunity, to make exceptions to normal academic rules and policies as warranted by the circumstances. Although it is recognized that the student or subordinate may be a full and willing participant in an Intimate Relationship, both the responsibility for adhering to this policy and the consequences for violating it fall upon the person in a position of power or authority, rather than the student or subordinate. Violations of this policy are referred to the appropriate disciplinary procedure based on the status of the employee in the position of greater power or authority over the other individual.

Consensual Relationships Policy

This policy also applies to any individual under contract or on assignment at the university. This policy does not apply to student employees. Nothing in this policy replaces university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Nor does it replace other university policies that may be related to conduct or relationships covered by this policy. The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the gender or the sexual orientation of the parties involved.

Last Revised Date: An employee violates this policy and his or her obligation to the student, to other students, to colleagues, by the Arizona Board of Regents under classifications “faculty,” “classified staff,” “university staff,” or “academic.

To address situations in which two persons have an apparently voluntary romantic or sexual relationship, but where a power differential exists because of their roles within the university, e. The University of Kansas has a tradition of commitment to providing an academic community environment that, without discrimination, fosters intellectual, professional and personal growth. Central to the preservation of this environment is the trust that should characterize all interactions among those working toward the common goal of the institution, namely, our students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff.

This trust is put at risk when members of the University community engage in consenting romantic or sexual relationships that involve persons of unequal power, for example, administrator and faculty, faculty and student, supervisor and employee. Because the University of Kansas strongly disapproves of consenting relationships where a professional power differential exists, this policy statement is being promulgated. These principles also apply to administrators and supervisors in their relationships with students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff.

Those who choose to ignore these standards will stand responsible for their actions and risk the loss of support of the University community. If an employee’s supervisor attempts to initiate a personal relationship, the employee may feel that the employee’s options are similarly limited. As a result, the degree of informed consent that exists within such a relationship is difficult to establish. Should a charge of sexual harassment follow, a claim of mutual consent may be difficult to sustain.

Similar proscription applies to administrators and supervisors in their relationships with students and employees over whom they have an evaluative role. A supervisor who is in a romantic or sexual relationship with another individual where an evaluative responsibility must be removed from personnel decisions concerning that individual, such as appointment, retention, promotion, discipline, tenure, or salary.

Failure to do so will be a conflict of interest.

Consensual Relationships

The relationship between teacher and student is the foundation of the academic mission of the University. This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears the responsibility to serve as mentor, educator, and evaluator. In discharging this responsibility, teachers are accountable for behaving in a manner that reflects the highest levels of professional responsibility, recognizes the dignity and worth of each person at the University, and protects the integrity of the student-teacher relationship.

Teacher-student relationships carry risks of conflict of interest, breach of trust, abuse of power, and breach of professional ethics. For these reasons, teachers must not engage in any consensual sexual relationships with a student while the teacher is in a position of supervisory academic authority with respect to the student.

Real policy changes did not occur until the late s and s, It is usually suggested that no professor should date a student in his class.

I wonder if they are single? On the other hand, these pairings have led to healthy relationships—including marriages—even here at UVU. Ian Wilson, senior vice president of academic affairs. In class there are clear roles that shape how professors and students interact with one another. Outside of the classroom there can be less professionalism in how we conduct ourselves. In recent years, communication between students and professors has changed dramatically with it not being uncommon for professors and students to communicate through text messages.

The advent of social media is impacting the way students and professors interact with one another. The extent it impacts relationships with professors and students remains to be seen. That factor is whether or not a student is currently enrolled in a course being taught by the professor or participating in academic work that is supervised by the professor. Professionalism is fostered by an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect.

Trust and respect are diminished when those in positions of authority abuse, or appear to abuse, their power. It is with this mission in mind that the university has this policy in place.

Handbook for Directors of Undergraduate Studies in Yale College 2019–2020

If a member of staff is unsure whether or not a relationship with a student should be disclosed under this policy, the member of staff should disclose it. Search site. International students Continuing education Executive and professional education Courses in education.

Should a professor be allowed to date their students? media attention in and , UBC policy concerning faculty-student relationships.

This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal institutional power inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion. The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development. Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided.

In addition to creating the potential for coercion, any such relationship jeopardizes the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students. Finally, such situations may expose the University and the teacher to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

Therefore, teachers see below must avoid sexual relationships with students over whom they have or might reasonably expect to have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities, regardless of whether the relationship is consensual. Conversely, teachers must not directly supervise any student with whom they have a sexual relationship. Undergraduate students are particularly vulnerable to the unequal institutional power inherent in the teacher-student relationship and the potential for coercion, because of their age and relative lack of maturity.

Therefore, no teacher shall have a sexual or amorous relationship with any undergraduate student, regardless of whether the teacher currently exercises or expects to have any pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over that student.

College and University Blog

Tulane University is currently monitoring the development of Tropical Storm Laura and Tropical Depression 14 with our weather partners. Close Search form Search. Consensual Relationships Policy. Interactions between the students of the University and those administrators, faculty and staff who have institutional authority over them are to be guided by mutual trust, confidence, and professional ethics.

This policy applies to all faculty, staff and students of George Mason University. II. Sexual or romantic relationships between employees and students have the This policy will become effective upon the date of approval by the Senior Vice.

This policy highlights the risks in sexual or romantic relationships in the Stanford workplace or academic setting between individuals in inherently unequal positions; prohibits certain relationships between teachers and students; and requires recusal from supervision and evaluation and notification in other relationships. Applies to all students, faculty, staff, and others who participate in Stanford programs and activities.

There are special risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions, and parties in such a relationship assume those risks. In the university context, such positions include but are not limited to teacher and student, supervisor and employee, senior faculty and junior faculty, mentor and trainee, adviser and advisee, teaching assistant and student, principal investigator and postdoctoral scholar or research assistant, coach and athlete, attending physician and resident or fellow, and individuals who supervise the day-to-day student living environment and their students.

Because of the potential for conflict of interest, exploitation, favoritism, and bias, such relationships may undermine the real or perceived integrity of the supervision and evaluation provided. Further, these relationships are often less consensual than the individual whose position confers power or authority believes. In addition, circumstances may change, and conduct that was previously welcome may become unwelcome. Even when both parties have consented at the outset to a sexual or romantic involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for a charge based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct.

Such relationships may also have unintended, adverse effects on the climate of an academic program or work unit, thereby impairing the learning or working environment for others — both during such a relationship and after any break-up. Relationships in which one party is in a position to evaluate the work or influence the career of the other may provide grounds for complaint by third parties when that relationship gives undue access or advantage, restricts opportunities, or simply creates a perception of these problems.

Additionally, even when a relationship ends, there may be bias even if unintentional for or against the former partner, or there could be an ongoing impression of such bias; in other words, the effects of a romantic or sexual relationship can extend beyond the relationship itself.

Improper Relationships between Students & Employees

Institutions tend to either ban student-faculty dating altogether or where a supervisory relationship exists. The ages of the couple — her, 25; him, 71 — are unusually far apart. Princeton, like a growing number of institutions, has banned all student-faculty relationships, including for graduate students. Platt has said that she waited until two years after her graduation to ask Mitchell out. Mitchell, who is currently on preplanned leave, is just one of a number of professors to engage in or attempt to initiate a relationship with a former student or students.

Still, experts with different positions on student-faculty dating advise against adopting any kind of timeline for dating former students.

For example, dating, romantic, sexual etc. which is consensual. Ethics Statement policy and the conflict of interest procedure. A professor arranged for private one-on-one sessions at their home with a student, indicating.

This policy covers all UW System employees, students, and affiliated individuals. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the employment and academic environment is free from real or perceived conflicts of interest when UW employees, students, and affiliated individuals, in positions of unequal power, are involved in consensual romantic or sexual relationships. Even where negative consequences to the participants do not result, such relationships create an environment charged with potential or perceived conflicts of interest and possible use of academic or supervisory leverage to maintain or promote the relationship.

Romantic or sexual relationships that the parties may view as consensual may still raise questions of favoritism, as well as of an exploitative abuse of trust and power. The following two types of consensual relationships are addressed in this policy: 1 employee with a student; and 2 employee with another employee. It is a violation of this policy for an instructor to commence a consensual relationship with a student currently under their instruction, and may result in disciplinary action against that employee.

If an instructor or other employee fails to meet the requirements for disclosing the relationship with a student or another employee, or fails to cooperate in the actions described above, such a failure constitutes a violation of this policy and may result in disciplinary action taken against that employee. To report potential violations of this policy, individuals should contact either the Director of Human Resources or the Title IX Coordinator.

Retaliation against persons who report concerns about potential violations of this policy is prohibited.

Universities Grapple with Student-Faculty Relationships

A number of colleges and universities banned faculty-undergraduate dating or otherwise shored up their consensual relationship policies after the Education Department published a reminder letter about sexual harassment liability, in Other institutions had adopted such policies earlier. And while many involved in or affected by these decisions support them as preventing potential abuse, others remain critical of policing connections between consenting adults.

Fear of legal liability and increasing acknowledgement of academic power structures changed that, leading institutions to adopt a mix of policies regarding these relationships. Its rationale for doing so, stated in the policy itself, sums up much of the thinking behind blanket bans on undergraduate-faculty dating.

At San Diego State University, faculty and staff must abide by the consensual relationships policy set forth in the Executive Order The policy.

The University has an interest in ensuring that academic, employment, and business matters are decided on objective bases. At an institution such as the University of Arizona, a variety of personal and romantic relationships may exist among employees, University agents, students, and third parties. The University establishes this personnel policy to address conflicts of interest arising from interpersonal relationships not otherwise covered by existing policies or law.

The intent of this policy is to direct employees to disclose relationships that have created or may create conflicts of interest and to give the University an opportunity to manage and reconcile any such conflicts, if possible. Employees who violate this policy may be subject to disciplinary action; however, because this policy is designed to encourage employees to disclose personal relationships that may give rise to or have given rise to conflicts of interest, an alleged violation of this policy may not be a basis upon which employees may file grievances against one another.

Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, or Evaluative Context: Romantic or sexual relationships between employees and students when the employees do not have a direct instructional, supervisory, or evaluative responsibility with respect to the student are not per se prohibited. They may, however, result in a conflict of interest, particularly when the employee and student are in the same unit or in units that are allied. In such situations, employees shall remove themselves from any decisions that may reward or penalize students with whom they are or have been romantically or sexually involved.

An employee violates this policy and his or her obligation to the student, to other students, to colleagues, and to the University when such employee participates in decisions that may reward or penalize a student with whom the employee has, or has had at any time, a romantic or sexual relationship. Relationships with Employees and Students in Other Contexts: No University employee shall engage in a romantic or sexual relationship with another employee when one of those employees supervises or evaluates the other employee.

No employee may supervise another employee or student with whom that employee lives, whether or not the individuals are engaged in a romantic or sexual relationship.

Relationship Restrictions

The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes only. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of situations in which this policy applies. These examples illustrate the application of this policy, which as stated in II The University of Iowa Search. Operations Manual. Student B is in a class taught by Professor A.

This policy applies to consensual romantic, dating and sexual relationships between employees (faculty and staff) and students; and employees with other.

The University of Texas System institutions and the University of Texas System Administration shall adopt policies addressing consensual relationships. The policies shall comply in all substantive respects with a model developed by the Office of General Counsel, shall be published in the institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures, and shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:.

Such relationships are prohibited even if only a single event. If managing the conflict is not possible, the relationship is prohibited. System Administration and institutions may develop and adopt more stringent consensual relationship policies or adopt more stringent policies for specific units where it is not possible to manage the conflict inherent in the relationship. In any event, failure to disclose the relationship and document Sec.

If sexual harassment is established, it shall constitute a policy violation in addition to a violation of the consensual relationships policy. One or more offices shall be designated as offices where students, faculty, and employees can obtain advice about sexual harassment, sexual assault, and consensual relationship concerns. In addition, U.

BEST CLASSROOM APRIL FOOLS PRANK EVER